Welcome, ברוך הבא, Welkom, Добро пожаловать, Bienvenue, Bienvenido, 歓迎, υποδοχή

This site is meant to give some insight to scripture. It can be used by anyone for lessons. It is also a place to discuss the issues of the Bible, not the Church. You can leave an anonymous comment if you feel the need. All comments are moderated and all posts will be answered, even the oldest of posts. No requirements are needed.

To discuss church and Christian-life related issues, click here http://ideasoftimreligion.blogspot.com/. Or click on links on side of the page. Please vote on polls.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

(2) Six Days, Genesis 1:1-31

Genesis 1:1-31
Some people say that the earth and the universe are billions of years old. And on the other hand you have those who think the world is only 6000 years old. Let's take a look at what the Bible says on the subject.
  • 1 In the beginning God (Elohim) created the heavens and the earth.
  • 2 The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters.
  • 3 Then God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light.
  • 4 God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness.
  • 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day.
The first argument will come over the word "day". First of all, a suggestion; do not use the Greek language to decipher the OT. It was not originally in Greek. The original version is closer to Hebrew. The Hebrew word for day is "yom". Now day has a couple of meanings. It could mean: "back in my day", "24 hour period", or "daytime- when light is hitting the earth". Notice that verse 5 starts the problem. It has the word day in it twice and it is used as two of the meanings listed. But since this word has more than one meaning, there are those who will say that the second time day is used could mean an "indefinite time period". Hence this is where billions of years comes in. Christians who try and rationalize billions of years will bring in the scripture verses of Psalms 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8. Both of these scriptures link a thousand years to God is like a day. That would be an incorrect interpretation of these verses. Both passages here talk about how God has been around forever. These verses mean that time is not important to God. He is beyond all measures of time. Day one had one part daylight and one part night. If this was supposed to be billions of years then that was one long day.
Another argument will be about light. Some stars are billions of light years away from us. So, in order for us to be able to see their light then the universe has to be billions of years old for it would take that long for their light to travel. The natural law of physics would not allow this to be any other way. True. But God created the laws of physics. God is not part of the natural world. God set things into motion and to do that He created this in state of maturity. Adam was not a baby when he was created. Light was the first thing after the universe that was created. It was in its maturity. Let there be light and BOOM there was light, everywhere. They do have a neat theory. It is called doubling time theory. With the expansion of the universe happening in their eyes, every time the universe doubles in size, time is cut in half. Given the rate of the speed of light and the calculations of how big they say the universe is one can use the following to decipher how old they say the universe is:
  • day one took 8 billion years
  • day two took 4 billion
  • day three took 2 billion
  • day four took 1 billion
  • day five took 500 million
  • day six took 250 million
  • and the Christian scientists claims we are still in day seven
Add these together and you get 15 3/4 billion years.
www.aish.com/societywork/sciencenature/Age_of_the_Universe.asp will give you more information on this theory. It is neat but doesn't hold all the water.
Science tells us that the sun had appeared by an explosion of gas and bits and pieces were thrown into our solar system. When these pieces cooled you have some planets forming. Same with the moon. Earth started to cool and a piece of earth had broken off and cooled 300,000 miles away in the form of our moon. So science tells us the order of these things coming into existence as: Stars, Sun, Earth, Moon. But scripture tells us that the earth came first. Then the light. Then the sun and moon and stars. The earth is the oldest but not billions of years old. So, if some of these stars we could not see until today because they are 15 billion light years away, and the stars were not created until the 4th day then by their own theory the stars could only be 3 billion years old at the most. Thereby if you stick to the doubling theory then the earth is either 60 billion years old or the stars are a lot closer than they thought. Or the Bible is inaccurate about which came first. In any way, their theory now has holes in it or the Bible does.

To get the final picture you have to go back to the way Genesis was written. Remember from Lesson A, Genesis was written so we could understand it. Six days is six days.

4 comments:

No Doubt said...

Hello Mr. Gozreht

After our discussion on the phone, I started reading your blog practically everyday. It's good. Lively at times. :)

As for your Genesis study, the time issue between 15 billion years and 6000 might have been resolved by two Australian scientists, Trevor Norman and Barry Setterfield.

They claim that the speed of light has been slowing down since the creation of the universe. If fact, the change follows a cosecant curve. If this is true, that means light traveled at a far greater speed in the distant past.

When plotted on a time chart, light from the distant stars has traveled the distance to the earth far faster than previously thought. 14.7 billion years could have taken only approximately 6000 years.

Obviously controversial and not all scientists have accepted the data. However, more and more scientists, christian and non-christian, are realizing they can't just disregard it. We'll see.

It proven wrong, there's always the gap theory. :)

PS. I miss those Saturday morning Worship times. Petra Rocks but Third Day is better. :) :) :) Made you laugh.

Gozreht said...

Thank you, No Doubt. As this is obvious, this person is one of my best friends. And I still acknowledge that.

You have a great study there. Cosecant curves are curves that are the reciprocals of a COSINE of the curve.

If one could plot this, instead of a contiuous curve like a wave, this curve would be shaped like a horse shoe. In layman terms this means there is a beginning and an end. And it changes in between the beginning and the end.

The gap theory? Ugh! Totally non-Biblical. Non-sense that some tried to rationalize their theories with because they couldn't explain things. But thanks for bringing that up.

There is a continuous flow from Day one and Day two. Scripture does not back up aby gaps between any of these verses. It literally states, DAY ONE and DAY TWO. Big grin my friend.

Petra is old school. Third Day is no school. Let me do the schooling. :)

Gozreht said...

I mean "any" gaps. Not "aby". Sorry.

Gozreht said...

Please keep in mind although I respect AIG and their studies, I do not "follow" them and do not consider myself an AIGer. We do hold many of the same beliefs but I had these beliefs way before I even heard of AIG.

Follow by Email